SFAC Tomorrow 6pm.....Tawes
This one promises to be a good one. See you there.
-D Meeting of the MDNR Sport Fish Advisory Commission February 22, 2010 6:00-9:00 PM Final Agenda Tawes State Office Building C-1 Conference Room Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Agenda 5:30- 6:00 - Arrival/Dinner Served 6:00 - 6:10 Welcome/Announcements/Approval of the Agenda Marty Gary, MD DNR Fisheries Service 6:10 6:20 NRP Report - Sergeant Brian Albert, NRP Desired Outcome Update the Commission on recent NRP activity and fishery violations 6:20 - 6:50 Legislative and Regulatory Update - Tom OConnell & Harley Speir, MD DNR Fisheries Service Desired Outcome Update the Commission on the pending & proposed legislation and regulations (Handout) 6:50 7:20 Inland Fisheries Management Update - Don Cosden, MD DNR Fisheries Service Desired Outcome Brief the Commission on inland fisheries issues, including: Tidal Black Bass Roundtable, Savage Reservoir Project Status, Whirling Disease & Regulation discussion for 2010 with feedback from the Commission (Handouts) 7:20 7:45 River Herring Management - Bob Sadzinski, MD DNR Fisheries Service Desired Outcome Presentation, discussion and recommendations from the commission for potential river herring management options (Handout) 7:45 8:00 Summer Flounder Management - Carrie Kennedy, MD DNR Fisheries Service Desired Outcome Presentation and discussion of options for MDs 2010 season with feedback from the commission (Handout) 8:00 8:25 - ASMFC & Mid Atlantic Council Update - Tom OConnell, MD DNR Fisheries Service Desired Outcome Update the commission on the proceedings of ASMFCs Winter Meeting (Handout) 8:25 8:40 Flexibility to Fish Act Discussion - Steve Early, MD DNR Fisheries Service Desired Outcome Understanding Magnuson-Stevens, the Flexibility Act amendment, constituent concerns and future expectations 8:40 8:50 Diamond Jim Update - Marty Gary, MD DNR Fisheries Service Desired Outcome Update the Commission on the status of the Diamond Jim Contest 8:50- 9:00 Public Comment - Marty Gary, MD DNR Fisheries Service Desired Outcome Opportunity for the public to provide comment on issues discussed 9:00 Adjourn |
Thanks for reminder.
|
anyonoe trying to make the meeting tonight?
I am trying to make it. |
Quote:
|
I will be there :)
|
Anything interesting to report from the meeting? I really wanted to go but had committed to teach that evening.
Hans |
The Flounder season options had a decent discussion and a 3 motions before we passed a recommendation.
Last year we went over our TAC(Total Allowable Catch) by 23+%. Therefore, they reduce the TAC target for this year by at least 23+% There were 5 options Option 1 April 17 to September 21 3 @ 18.5 24.5% Option 2 April 24 to September 24 3 @ 18.5 24.5% Option 3 June 8 to October 30 3 @ 18.5 24.5% Option 4 May 22 to October 16 3 @ 18.5 24.5% Option 5 April 17 to Nov 22 3 @ 19.0 24.2% I believe the first motion was to recommend #5. Motion made by Larry Coburn and seconded by Marty Gary. Richie Gaines did not support the motion and preferred 18.5" and explained that any situation when we are releasing a lot of flounder to get a keeper is not good b/c many get deep hooked. We were told that C&R mortality is calculated into the options. I felt that the long season afforded by #5 was desirable and did not see the 1/2" difference to be an issue. I think the motion failed 4 to 6. Another motion was made and then not seconded. I believe we unanimously passed a motion for #2 w/ one abstention from Ed O'brien. This is all my recollection of the voting and discussion. I will gladly let you all know when the minutes and transcripts are available. Tom O'Connell explained his reasoning behind voting in favor of the ASMFC discussing a Coastal Commercial Striper Quota increase. He made a good case, and explained that MD's vote to support the discussion does not mean that MD will necessarily support a Quota increase. Again, the transcript will give you more insight into Tom's decision. There was a fantastic presentation on River Herring and their plight in the Mid Atlantic. The Commission made a motion to recommend a harvest moratorium. The lion share of the commercial direct harvest(non bycatch) is done by 2 license holders w/ cast nets. The MSA reform "March" and Flexibility act were discussed. Steve Earley did a great job of framing the issue and both Ed O'Brien and I shared some thoughts on the issue. Again, the transcript will allow you to read what was said. Keep an eye on the SFAC website for updates. I will keep you all updated. http://www.dnr.state.md.us/fisheries...sfacindex.html -Dave Sikorski CCA MD Rep. SFAC |
Thanks Dave; I know you don't hear it often from those of us on the board, but we appreciate you representing us:). Keep up the good work.
5th (Marty) |
Dave is a great representative to have on the commission. :)
Flounder regs didnt go as I had hoped as I would have prefered option 3, 4 or 5 over option 2 that passed. However I understand why number 2 passed as the flounder fishery is primarily a coastal fishery and there were expressed concerns over deep hooking mortality trying to reach the 19" and the 18.5" fish being more opportunistic for ches bay fisherman. I thought Option 4 would have been the best option since it would have started the season just before memorial day and run into Oct. However I am told that the coastal fishery is important to have it start earlier in May would be more beneficial to their fishery. A 1/2" is probably equal to several inches in striped bass and the majority of flounder fishing is done with bait fishing so release mortality can be relatively high. I will say that Capt Ed did abstain from the flounder vote on the options presented but spoke about his disapproval over the ASMFC not approving MD to have a split in regulations between the bay and the coastal fishery. DNR did note that they had over 100 people attend the regulations meeting in OCMD and the vast majority of attendees voted for number 5 with the long season and 19" min. They noted that their email responses have been the same. I will be a little more challenging to Tom O'Connells support of the increase in coastal commerical quota. Here is what I posted on the other forum: Mr. O'Connell best tried to justify the stance he and Maryland took at the ASMFC through a "fairness" (for lack of a better term) stance. Of course there were charts thrown up over how the coastal recreational quotas have steadily increased over the years while the commercial harvest quotas have remained flat. It is important to note that all of these charts failed to include the changes in demand for these fish commercially through market prices and/or the impacts of either fisheries, recreational or commercial, to our state economies. |
Thanks Guys. It's my pleasure to serve on the commission.
-D |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger