02-04-2011, 05:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mt. Airy, MD
Posts: 483
|
|
All of the illegal nets were removed by NRP and taken to Mattapeake along with the rock fish ( proceeds of a crime) This becomes property of the State (DNR) No need for any more speculation as the truth will be discovered in an investigation. This is a sad situation for all involved..........especially the rock fish...............Gary
|
02-04-2011, 09:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 1,430
|
|
see the video here by wbal
http://www.baltimoresun.com/videobet...Chesapeake-Bay
note that there are two videos back to back. The second one follows the first.
Last edited by B-Faithful; 02-04-2011 at 09:37 PM.
|
02-05-2011, 06:57 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 163
|
|
15,000 yards of illegal nets found last February according to the DNR in the video. Sounds like this problem is pretty big and not isolated. I do not remember hearing about this last year which makes me wonder.
|
02-05-2011, 07:10 AM
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 25
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockleyneck
15,000 yards of illegal nets found last February according to the DNR in the video. Sounds like this problem is pretty big and not isolated. I do not remember hearing about this last year which makes me wonder.
|
That's exactly what I was thinking. 15,000 and no news "flashes" nor "big" catches.
My take - Either this was a set-up or the Striper population in the bay has drastically improved.
What's your take?
|
02-05-2011, 08:01 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 163
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MdCrappie
That's exactly what I was thinking. 15,000 and no news "flashes" nor "big" catches.
My take - Either this was a set-up or the Striper population in the bay has drastically improved.
What's your take?
|
I think these nets were set by rouge waterman. Last year it would seem that the DNR wanted to keep this quiet which is interesting. It would seem the DNR is taking a different tact with the publicity of what appears to be a widespread problem.
|
02-05-2011, 08:05 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Linthicum,Md
Posts: 2,983
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockleyneck
15,000 yards of illegal nets found last February according to the DNR in the video. Sounds like this problem is pretty big and not isolated. I do not remember hearing about this last year which makes me wonder.
|
If DNR had reported 15,000 yards of illegal nets found last February and they had as much media attention; do you think they could have passed the new PSCR restrictions?
Six rods, no stingers, crimped barbs, and originally calling for only 3 days allowed to fish; why the fishing community would have seen this as what it is; a rediculous proposal .
DNR has become very proficient at playing the political game. I don't trust them . NRP did a nice job finding the nets, but DNR decided on the best way to promote the illegal activity. Last year no news; this year full coverage, sounds political to me Mr Marty Gary.
5th (Marty)
__________________
|
02-05-2011, 09:17 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,114
|
|
Wish I was better at computer search.
Going from memory - I think there was a few news stories about the found gill nets from 2009 and also 2010. Seems it was in Sunpaper or Fisherman.
A few nets are found each year - this from DNR.
I'd guess the poachers set them and in 2-3 days , haul them up. Does not give DNR much time to find them.
I remember clearly on TF - maybe 3 years ago - guys posted GPS numbers for a sumberged net off radar screens at Ches. Beach. They hung up trolling gear and brought a piece of the net up.
Same thing in Potomac - up near #5 marker. Guys were snagging.
I think DNR went and got the nets up.
|
02-05-2011, 12:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 83
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5th Tuition
If DNR had reported 15,000 yards of illegal nets found last February and they had as much media attention; do you think they could have passed the new PSCR restrictions?
Six rods, no stingers, crimped barbs, and originally calling for only 3 days allowed to fish; why the fishing community would have seen this as what it is; a rediculous proposal .
DNR has become very proficient at playing the political game. I don't trust them . NRP did a nice job finding the nets, but DNR decided on the best way to promote the illegal activity. Last year no news; this year full coverage, sounds political to me Mr Marty Gary.
5th (Marty)
|
Marty, I love your passion/obsession with PSCR last year
I agree with you though, don't trust DNR, but don't trust MSSA or CCA either. No matter what they say, they will always do what's in their best interest.
|
02-05-2011, 12:41 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 110
|
|
DNR is pushing several Bills which give them increased, intrusive police powers which they currently don't have. Don't you think all of this publicity is happening for a reason? DNR's pushing all of the buttons they can to get a favorable result on their Bills. If they don't come up with somebody who is repsonsible for these nets, I'm going to start believing the conspiracy theories about DNR having a hand in it.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
New Forum Posts
CBA Event
Calendar Advertise on CBA
Log Out
Local Charter
Boats
Upcoming Tournaments
|