Is DNR wanting to eliminate limited entry for charters and commercial licenses?

[B-Faithful]

Bill just introduced into the house on behalf of DNR:

http://mlis.state.md.us/2012rs/bills/hb/hb1372f.pdf

Is the DNR cost recovery plan to sell more licenses?

[Spot77]

Originally Posted by B-Faithful

Bill just introduced into the house on behalf of DNR:

http://mlis.state.md.us/2012rs/bills/hb/hb1372f.pdf

I've read a lot of bills over the years, but this is one of the worst written bills I've seen in a long time.

To introduce such a convoluted bill this late in the session traditionally gauruntees it to fail.

Maybe one of our chater captains can chime in on how they think this will affect things.....What does the charter boat association think of this?

[B-Faithful]

I posted the bill as soon as it was emailed to me so I havent had a chance to fully understand it. I will make some calls tomorrow to get a smart guy to help explain it to me.

It appears as if DNR wants to set the number of entries. Either way, I guarantee the MCBA and the MWA will not be happy. However, I personally an not sure what to think. I need some time to consider it. It could stand to hurt the full-time guys on both sides the most if it expands the number of participants, especially the watermen. (a good full time charter guy will likely remain busy). While I have adovcated for reallocation and gear restrictions, I am not sure it would be good to put an influx of part-time watermen in the market for those that truely make a living on the water. It likely would also cause more violations and enforcement issues. However, like I said, I dont understand the bill as of yet and the additional licenses may be sold to existing watermen first. I just dont know at this point, especially since I put this post up immediately after someone emailing me the bill.

[reds]

Originally Posted by B-Faithful

I posted the bill as soon as it was emailed to me so I havent had a chance to fully understand it. I will make some calls tomorrow to get a smart guy to help explain it to me.

It appears as if DNR wants to set the number of entries. Either way, I guarantee the MCBA and the MWA will not be happy. However, I personally an not sure what to think. I need some time to consider it. It could stand to hurt the full-time guys on both sides the most if it expands the number of participants, especially the watermen. (a good full time charter guy will likely remain busy). While I have adovcated for reallocation and gear restrictions, I am not sure it would be good to put an influx of part-time watermen in the market for those that truely make a living on the water. It likely would also cause more violations and enforcement issues. However, like I said, I dont understand the bill as of yet and the additional licenses may be sold to existing watermen first. I just dont know at this point, especially since I put this post up immediately after someone emailing me the bill.

Sure are worrying about something that really doesn't concern you. The answer is not what you think. And yeah it's a terrible written bill.