Partner Sites:  www.BOEmarine.com | www.ClubSeaRay.com | www.BandofBoaters.com


Go Back   CBAngler.com - Chesapeake Bay Angler - The Ultimate Fisherman's Resource > CBAngler Forums > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2015, 06:33 PM
5th Tuition 5th Tuition is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Linthicum,Md
Posts: 2,983
Default Holy Crap!!

Per CCA email today!!

Interesting developments at the ASMFC today. There was a "move to include an additional option for Maryland and the Potomac River Fisheries Commission for a spring trophy fishery, pending approval by the TC, of one fish at 28-36" or one fish over 40". Motion by Mr. O'Connel, second by Mr. Gary."

This motion passed!!


This doesn't mean this will be the new 2015 season regulations; but it means there is now another option on the table which includes what we all thought would be adopted (36' fish or larger).

This is going to get interesting
5th
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2015, 06:42 PM
Joe Walsh Joe Walsh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 199
Default

Don't worry Marty, I am sure you will limit out every trip... Hope your keeping warm...

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2015, 07:12 PM
5th Tuition 5th Tuition is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Linthicum,Md
Posts: 2,983
Default

Not really worried about "limiting out" because I don't bring very many trophy size fish home anyway. I like a 25-30 inch fish for eating; but my guests (some who don't fish much) like to take home a "big one".

Charters will have a real problem throwing 37, 38, and 39 inch fish back:roll eyes:
5th
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2015, 10:42 PM
Chessie27 Chessie27 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chestertown,MD
Posts: 1,488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5th Tuition View Post
what we all thought would be adopted (36' fish or larger).

This is going to get interesting
5th
36' or larger fish?? Sounds like you might be needing a bigger boat!
__________________
- Jeff
36' Judge "JUSTIFIED"

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-06-2015, 07:16 AM
reds reds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5th Tuition View Post
Not really worried about "limiting out" because I don't bring very many trophy size fish home anyway. I like a 25-30 inch fish for eating; but my guests (some who don't fish much) like to take home a "big one".

Charters will have a real problem throwing 37, 38, and 39 inch fish back:roll eyes:
5th
This new proposal was proposed by the charterboat people. First at the January SFAC then the TFAC.
__________________
250 years of Eastern Shore heritage.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-06-2015, 08:25 AM
5th Tuition 5th Tuition is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Linthicum,Md
Posts: 2,983
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds View Post
This new proposal was proposed by the charterboat people. First at the January SFAC then the TFAC.
Wasn't it proposed by "some" of the charter boat people? A certain sector in Solomon's?

As I said, I can live with a slot limit, but won't charter customers have a problem tossing back those slot fish?
5th
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-06-2015, 10:17 AM
reds reds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5th Tuition View Post
Wasn't it proposed by "some" of the charter boat people? A certain sector in Solomon's?

As I said, I can live with a slot limit, but won't charter customers have a problem tossing back those slot fish?
5th
Wasn't it proposed by "some" of the charter boat people? A certain sector in Solomon's?
If you knew that, why didn't you post that in the original post?

Whether you knew this or not, The Maryland Charterboat Association and the Upper Bay Captain's Association are both on board with the proposal.

That only leaves some the Deale Boys not spoken for since the Rod and Reel guys are mixed in with the Solomon group.

Oh and the president of the MCA has resigned.

Personally, I'd rather have 28" to 36" and the original proposal of over 43" then anything else.
__________________
250 years of Eastern Shore heritage.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-06-2015, 10:26 AM
bhl bhl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5th Tuition View Post
Wasn't it proposed by "some" of the charter boat people? A certain sector in Solomon's?

As I said, I can live with a slot limit, but won't charter customers have a problem tossing back those slot fish?
5th
I would just like to be able to give my customers a credible answer as to why we need to save certain size fish. If it is to save the large breeders, so be it. The two proposals above seem to contradict each others ultimate goals.
Maybe we will have a decision before April 18th.
__________________

27 Judge "HOOK 'EM"
bhl (Bruce)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-06-2015, 11:00 AM
reds reds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhl View Post
I would just like to be able to give my customers a credible answer as to why we need to save certain size fish. If it is to save the large breeders, so be it. The two proposals above seem to contradict each others ultimate goals.
Maybe we will have a decision before April 18th.
The two proposals above are the same except the /or over 40". The original proposal was for 44" and the Soloman's group changed it to 40 or 41 in a letter to TFAC.

Either way, the intention was to protect the breeders of over 36". I might add that the commercial sector has a max limit of 36".
__________________
250 years of Eastern Shore heritage.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-2015, 11:10 AM
bhl bhl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reds View Post
The two proposals above are the same except the /or over 40". The original proposal was for 44" and the Soloman's group changed it to 40 or 41 in a letter to TFAC.

Either way, the intention was to protect the breeders of over 36". I might add that the commercial sector has a max limit of 36".
Reds,
Sorry, the proposals that I was referring to were the two in 5th's original post.
"one fish over 36" and "one fish between 28 and 36" and one over 40".
The one fish over 36" doesn't do much protecting of the breeders.
__________________

27 Judge "HOOK 'EM"
bhl (Bruce)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger


New Forum Posts
CBA Event Calendar
Advertise on CBA
Log Out

Local Charter Boats





Upcoming Tournaments